2for22
India v West Indies

India v West Indies: the fastest-scoring series in India

Three games at 11.36 runs an over: no bilateral T20I series in India since 2016 has scored faster. Who scored the runs, who kept them down, and why off-spin held up best.

By 2for22 · 13 Oct 2026 · 3 min read

64646

11.36 runs an over. A batter's series.

The fastest of its kind

No bilateral T20I series in India since 2016 scored faster over its first three games.

Six batters above 10 an over

Shreyas Iyer led the way at 13.6 runs an over.

Off-spin held up best

Roston Chase went for 8.5 an over, the cheapest of anyone who bowled six overs or more.

The runs

The fastest-scoring series of its kind in India

After three games, India and West Indies have made 1,276 runs between them at 11.36 an over: 69 sixes, 121 fours, and four totals over 200 in six innings. We compared it with every bilateral T20I series played in India since 2016, taking the first three games of each. There are 17 of them, and none scored this quickly.

Runs an over, first three games of a bilateral T20I series in India
India v West IndiesOct 2026
11.36
India v New ZealandJan 2026
10.91
India v AustraliaNov 2023
10.76
India v West IndiesDec 2019
10.00
The middle of the 17since 2016
8.70
The slowestIndia v New Zealand, Jan 2023
7.42
See all 17 series
SeriesStartedRuns an over
India v New ZealandJan 202610.91
India v AustraliaNov 202310.76
India v West IndiesDec 201910.00
India v BangladeshOct 20249.64
India v South AfricaSep 20229.37
India v Sri LankaJan 20239.28
India v South AfricaJun 20228.83
India v Sri LankaFeb 20228.76
India v West IndiesFeb 20228.70
India v New ZealandNov 20218.16
India v EnglandJan 20258.13
India v BangladeshNov 20198.10
India v EnglandMar 20218.04
India v South AfricaDec 20258.01
India v EnglandJan 20177.91
India v West IndiesNov 20187.65
India v New ZealandJan 20237.42

It is quick by any standard, not just India's. Across 54 series between two full-member sides anywhere since 2023, the fastest first three games went at 10.91 an over.

The batters

Six batters above the rest

Six batters stand clearly apart. Each made 96 runs or more, which only about one batter in ten manages in the first three games of a series, and every one of them scored at more than 10 runs an over.

BatterRunsBallsS/RRuns an over
Sherfane Rutherford WI1729118911.3
Shai Hope WI1598718311.0
Shreyas Iyer IND1436322713.6
Ishan Kishan IND1176717510.5
Abhishek Sharma IND1105221212.7
Sanju Samson IND965617110.3
The bowlers

The bowlers who kept it down

Across the three games the bowlers went for 11.21 an over between them. These six, each with six overs or more, did best:

Bowler and typeOversRunsWktsEconomy
Roston Chase WIOff-spin11.49968.49
Gudakesh Motie WILeft-arm finger spin6.05819.67
Mayank Yadav INDRight-arm pace11.0110410.00
Arshdeep Singh INDLeft-arm pace12.0123410.25
Naman Dhir INDOff-spin9.095510.56
Kuldeep Yadav INDLeft-arm wrist spin8.086310.75

Chase stands apart: more than a run an over cheaper than anyone else who bowled six overs, and the most wickets in the series. Two of the three cheapest are finger spinners.

Bowling types

Finger spin is the cheapest bowling in T20 cricket

Every type of bowling went for far more than usual in this series. Off-spin was the cheapest type here, and right-arm pace, which bowled 44% of the balls, the most expensive, as in T20 internationals generally. The exception was left-arm finger spin, usually the cheapest of all, which went for 11.60 an over.

Runs an over by type of bowling
Off-spin
9.39
6.93
Left-arm pace
10.25
7.43
Left-arm wrist spin
10.75
7.36
Left-arm finger spin
11.60
6.47
Right-arm pace
12.10
7.73

No leg-spin was bowled in the series. Left-arm wrist spin is rare in T20 internationals, so its figure there rests on 126 overs.

In T20 internationals since 2023, finger spin is the cheapest bowling there is: left-arm finger spin goes at 6.47 an over and off-spin at 6.93, against 7.73 for right-arm pace. It is not only because spinners bowl the quieter middle overs. Within overs 7 to 16 the order is the same: 6.33 and 6.74 against 7.50.

Weak spots

Off-spin is the type batters most often struggle against

We looked at 713 batters with 300 balls or more in T20 cricket since 2023, and compared each one's runs above average against each type of bowling with every batter facing that type in the same overs. A weak spot is 0.05 runs a ball or more below average.

Share of batters for whom the type is a weak spot
Off-spin318 batters
35%
Leg-spin268 batters
31%
Left-arm finger spin355 batters
31%
Right-arm pace704 batters
31%
Left-arm pace242 batters
28%

Off-spin comes out on top, a weak spot for about one batter in three. The gap to the other types is not large, but it points the same way as the economy figures: off-spin is cheap in T20 cricket generally, and more batters have a weak spot against it than against anything else.

Summary

What the three games show

  • At 11.36 runs an over, this is the quickest-scoring of the 17 bilateral T20I series played in India since 2016.
  • Six batters made 96 runs or more, each at better than 10 runs an over. Shreyas Iyer went quickest, at 13.6.
  • Roston Chase's off-spin was the hardest bowling to score from, at 8.49 an over.
  • Finger spin is the cheapest bowling in T20 internationals, and off-spin is the type batters most often have a weak spot against.

Three games is a small sample. The fourth is on 14 October.

How we worked this out
  • The series is the first three games: India won the first by 8 wickets, West Indies the second by 6 wickets, India the third by 14 runs. Runs an over counts every run, including extras, over legal balls bowled.
  • The comparison is every bilateral T20I series in India since 2016 with at least three games, using the first three. Ball-by-ball data from cricsheet.org.
  • A batter's runs an over is his strike rate turned into overs: runs per ball times six.
  • Economy is runs conceded per over, counting wides and no-balls but not byes or leg byes, the same way for this series and for T20 internationals.
  • Weak spots use runs above average, our own ball-by-ball measure of the runs a batter adds compared with the expected score, so a dismissal costs runs as well.

More articles